Why Nana Agradaa’s 15-Year Sentence Was Reduced to 12 Months
Amasaman High Court says original jail term was harsh and disproportionate
Nana Agradaa’s Sentence Reduced
The Amasaman High Court has reduced the 15-year jail sentence handed to Evangelist Patricia Asiedua, popularly known as Nana Agradaa, to 12 months.
The decision, delivered on Thursday, February 5, 2026, has triggered widespread public debate, with many questioning the basis for the court’s ruling.
Why the Court Reduced the Sentence
The court upheld Nana Agradaa’s conviction for charlatanic advertising and defrauding by false pretenses but ruled that the original sentence of 15 years with hard labour was harsh and excessive.
According to the judge, while the offence was serious and deserving of punishment, sentencing must follow the principle of proportionality.
The court explained that punishment should balance:
Get early access to
- Breaking entertainment news before it trends
- Live sports updates & match alerts
- Exclusive viral videos & highlights
• The seriousness of the crime
• Fairness and reasonableness of the sentence
In this case, the court concluded that the original jail term went beyond what was reasonable under the circumstances.
Background of the Case
Nana Agradaa was accused of collecting money from church members after claiming she possessed money-doubling spiritual powers.
Prosecutors told the court that she used:
• Today’s TV
• Social media platforms
to promote the scheme and invite the public to an all-night church service, where she promised to double offerings through spiritual means.
More Than 1,000 Victims Affected
Court records revealed that over 1,000 people attended the service and handed over various sums of money, hoping to receive double in return.
However, the promise was never fulfilled, leading to her arrest, prosecution, and conviction.
Public Reaction and Ongoing Debate
The sentence reduction has divided public opinion:
• Some argue the court applied fairness and legal balance
• Others believe the punishment no longer reflects the scale of the alleged fraud
The ruling has renewed conversations about sentencing consistency, religious exploitation, and fraud cases involving social media influence in Ghana.
Discover more from InfoBusy
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.








